skip to content
 

Electrochemically actuated microelectrodes for minimally invasive peripheral nerve interfaces

Fri, 26/04/2024 - 11:00

Nat Mater. 2024 Apr 26. doi: 10.1038/s41563-024-01886-0. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Electrode arrays that interface with peripheral nerves are used in the diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders; however, they require complex placement surgeries that carry a high risk of nerve injury. Here we leverage recent advances in soft robotic actuators and flexible electronics to develop highly conformable nerve cuffs that combine electrochemically driven conducting-polymer-based soft actuators with low-impedance microelectrodes. Driven with applied voltages as small as a few hundreds of millivolts, these cuffs allow active grasping or wrapping around delicate nerves. We validate this technology using in vivo rat models, showing that the cuffs form and maintain a self-closing and reliable bioelectronic interface with the sciatic nerve of rats without the use of surgical sutures or glues. This seamless integration of soft electrochemical actuators with neurotechnology offers a path towards minimally invasive intraoperative monitoring of nerve activity and high-quality bioelectronic interfaces.

PMID:38671159 | DOI:10.1038/s41563-024-01886-0

Categories: 2022

Socioeconomic and ethnic disparities associated with access to cochlear implantation for severe-to-profound hearing loss: A multicentre observational study of UK adults

Thu, 04/04/2024 - 11:00

PLoS Med. 2024 Apr 4;21(4):e1004296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004296. eCollection 2024 Apr.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss may benefit from management with cochlear implants. These patients need a referral to a cochlear implant team for further assessment and possible surgery. The referral pathway may result in varied access to hearing healthcare. This study aimed to explore referral patterns and whether there were any socioeconomic or ethnic associations with the likelihood of referral. The primary outcome was to determine factors influencing referral for implant assessment. The secondary outcome was to identify factors impacting whether healthcare professionals had discussed the option of referral.

METHODS AND FINDINGS: A multicentre multidisciplinary observational study was conducted in secondary care Otolaryngology and Audiology units in Great Britain. Adults fulfilling NICE (2019) audiometric criteria for implant assessment were identified over a 6-month period between 1 July and 31 December 2021. Patient- and site-specific characteristics were extracted. Multivariable binary logistic regression was employed to compare a range of factors influencing the likelihood of implant discussion and referral including patient-specific (demographics, past medical history, and degree of hearing loss) and site-specific factors (cochlear implant champion and whether the hospital performed implants). Hospitals across all 4 devolved nations of the UK were invited to participate, with data submitted from 36 urban hospitals across England, Scotland, and Wales. Nine hospitals (25%) conducted cochlear implant assessments. The majority of patients lived in England (n = 5,587, 86.2%); the rest lived in Wales (n = 419, 6.5%) and Scotland (n = 233, 3.6%). The mean patient age was 72 ± 19 years (mean ± standard deviation); 54% were male, and 75·3% of participants were white, 6·3% were Asian, 1·5% were black, 0·05% were mixed, and 4·6% were self-defined as a different ethnicity. Of 6,482 submitted patients meeting pure tone audiometric thresholds for cochlear implantation, 311 already had a cochlear implant. Of the remaining 6,171, 35.7% were informed they were eligible for an implant, but only 9.7% were referred for assessment. When adjusted for site- and patient-specific factors, stand-out findings included that adults were less likely to be referred if they lived in more deprived area decile within Indices of Multiple Deprivation (4th (odds ratio (OR): 2·19; 95% confidence interval (CI): [1·31, 3·66]; p = 0·002), 5th (2·02; [1·21, 3·38]; p = 0·05), 6th (2·32; [1·41, 3·83]; p = 0.05), and 8th (2·07; [1·25, 3·42]; p = 0·004)), lived in London (0·40; [0·29, 0·57]; p < 0·001), were male (females 1·52; [1·27, 1·81]; p < 0·001), or were older (0·97; [0·96, 0·97]; p < 0·001). They were less likely to be informed of their potential eligibility if they lived in more deprived areas (4th (1·99; [1·49, 2·66]; p < 0·001), 5th (1·75; [1·31, 2·33], p < 0·001), 6th (1·85; [1·39, 2·45]; p < 0·001), 7th (1·66; [1·25, 2·21]; p < 0·001), and 8th (1·74; [1·31, 2·31]; p < 0·001) deciles), the North of England or London (North 0·74; [0·62, 0·89]; p = 0·001; London 0·44; [0·35, 0·56]; p < 0·001), were of Asian or black ethnic backgrounds compared to white patients (Asian 0·58; [0·43, 0·79]; p < 0·001; black 0·56; [0·34, 0·92]; p = 0·021), were male (females 1·46; [1·31, 1·62]; p < 0·001), or were older (0·98; [0·98, 0·98]; p < 0·001). The study methodology was limited by its observational nature, reliance on accurate documentation of the referring service, and potential underrepresentation of certain demographic groups.

CONCLUSIONS: The majority of adults meeting pure tone audiometric threshold criteria for cochlear implantation are currently not appropriately referred for assessment. There is scope to target underrepresented patient groups to improve referral rates. Future research should engage stakeholders to explore the reasons behind the disparities. Implementing straightforward measures, such as educational initiatives and automated pop-up tools for immediate identification, can help streamline the referral process.

PMID:38573882 | DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004296

Categories: 2022

A scoping review on the clinical effectiveness of Trans-Impedance Matrix (TIM) measurements in detecting extracochlear electrodes and tip fold overs in Cochlear Ltd devices

Thu, 07/03/2024 - 11:00

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0299597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299597. eCollection 2024.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Extrusion of electrodes outside the cochlea and tip fold overs may lead to suboptimal outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Intraoperative measures such as Trans-Impedance Matrix (TIM) measurements may enable clinicians to identify electrode malposition and direct surgeons to correctly place the electrode array during surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the current literature on the effectiveness of TIM measurements in identifying extracochlear electrodes and tip fold overs.

METHODS: A scoping review of studies on TIM-based measurements were carried out using the Databases-Medline/PubMed, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library following PRISMA guidelines. Eleven full texts articles met the inclusion criteria. Only human studies pertaining to TIM as a tool used in CI were included in the review. Further, patient characteristics, electrode design, and TIM measurement outcomes were reported.

RESULTS: TIM measurements were available for 550 implanted ears with the subjects age ranged between 9 months to 89 years. Abnormal TIM measurements were reported for 6.55% (36). Tip fold over was detected in 3.64% (20) of the cases, extracochlear electrodes in 1.45% (8), and 1.45% (8) were reported as buckling. Slim-modiolar electrode array designs were more common (54.71%) than pre-curved (23.34%) or lateral wall (21.95%) electrode array. Abnormal cochlear anatomy was reported for five ears (0.89%), with normal cochlear anatomy for all other patients.

CONCLUSION: TIM measurement is a promising tool for the intraoperative detection of electrode malposition. TIM measurement has a potential to replace intraoperative imaging in future. Though, TIM measurement is in its early stages of clinical utility, intuitive normative data sets coupled with standardised criteria for detection of abnormal electrode positioning would enhance its sensitivity.

PMID:38452034 | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0299597

Categories: 2022

Protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial of STeroid Administration Routes For Idiopathic Sudden sensorineural Hearing loss: The STARFISH trial

Thu, 29/02/2024 - 11:00

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0290480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290480. eCollection 2024.

ABSTRACT

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is the rapid onset of reduced hearing due to loss of function of the inner ear or hearing nerve of unknown aetiology. Evidence supports improved hearing recovery with early steroid treatment, via oral, intravenous, intratympanic or a combination of routes. The STARFISH trial aims to identify the most clinically and cost-effective route of administration of steroids as first-line treatment for ISSNHL. STARFISH is a pragmatic, multicentre, assessor-blinded, three-arm intervention, superiority randomised controlled trial (1:1:1) with an internal pilot (ISRCTN10535105, IRAS 1004878). 525 participants with ISSNHL will be recruited from approximately 75 UK Ear, Nose and Throat units. STARFISH will recruit adults with sensorineural hearing loss averaging 30dBHL or greater across three contiguous frequencies (confirmed via pure tone audiogram), with onset over a ≤3-day period, within four weeks of randomisation. Participants will be randomised to 1) oral prednisolone 1mg/Kg/day up to 60mg/day for 7 days; 2) intratympanic dexamethasone: three intratympanic injections 3.3mg/ml or 3.8mg/ml spaced 7±2 days apart; or 3) combined oral and intratympanic steroids. The primary outcome will be absolute improvement in pure tone audiogram average at 12-weeks following randomisation (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0kHz). Secondary outcomes at 6 and 12 weeks will include: Speech, Spatial and Qualities of hearing scale, high frequency pure tone average thresholds (4.0, 6.0 and 8.0kHz), Arthur Boothroyd speech test, Vestibular Rehabilitation Benefit Questionnaire, Tinnitus Functional Index, adverse events and optional weekly online speech and pure tone hearing tests. A health economic assessment will be performed, and presented in terms of incremental cost effectiveness ratios, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year. Primary analyses will be by intention-to-treat. Oral prednisolone will be the reference. For the primary outcome, the difference between group means and 97.5% confidence intervals at each time-point will be estimated via a repeated measures mixed-effects linear regression model.

PMID:38422002 | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0290480

Categories: 2022

A Multicenter Validity Study of Four Smartphone Hearing Test Apps in Optimized and Home Environments

Fri, 12/01/2024 - 11:00

Laryngoscope. 2024 Jan 12. doi: 10.1002/lary.31256. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Pure tone audiometry (PTA) is the gold standard for hearing assessment. However, it requires access to specialized equipment. Smartphone audiometry applications (apps) have been developed to perform automated threshold audiometry and could allow patients to perform self-administered screening or monitoring. This study aimed to assess the validity and feasibility of patients using apps to self-assess hearing thresholds at home, with comparison to PTA.

METHODS: A multi-center, prospective randomized study was conducted amongst patients undergoing PTA in clinics. Participants were randomly allocated to one of four publicly-available apps designed to measure pure tone thresholds. Participants used an app once in optimal sound-treated conditions and a further three times at home. Ear-specific frequency-specific thresholds and pure tone average were compared using Pearson correlation coefficient. The percentage of app hearing tests with results within ±10 dB of PTA was calculated. Patient acceptability was assessed via an online survey.

RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine participants submitted data. The results of two at-home automated smartphone apps correlated strongly/very strongly with PTA average and their frequency-specific median was within ±10 dB accuracy. Smartphone audiometry performed in sound-treated and home conditions were very strongly correlated. The apps were rated as easy/very easy to use by 90% of participants and 90% would be happy/very happy to use an app to monitor their hearing.

CONCLUSION: Judicious use of self-performed smartphone audiometry was both valid and feasible for two of four apps. It could provide frequency-specific threshold estimates at home, potentially allowing assessments of patients remotely or monitoring of fluctuating hearing loss.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 2024.

PMID:38214403 | DOI:10.1002/lary.31256

Categories: 2022

The effect of Photobiomodulation on Tinnitus: A Systematic Review

Thu, 23/11/2023 - 11:00

J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Nov 23:1-54. doi: 10.1017/S0022215123002165. Online ahead of print.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:37994052 | DOI:10.1017/S0022215123002165

Categories: 2022

Outcomes of cochlear implantation in Usher syndrome: a systematic review

Mon, 06/11/2023 - 11:00

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Nov 6. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08304-2. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study is a systematic review of the literature which seeks to evaluate auditory and quality of life (QOL) outcomes of cochlear implantation in patients with Usher syndrome.

METHODS: Systematic review of studies indexed in Medline via PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov was performed up to March 9th 2022, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Patient demographics, comorbidity, details of cochlear implantation, auditory, and QOL outcomes were extracted and summarized.

RESULTS: 33 studies reported over 217 cochlear implants in 187 patients with Usher syndrome, comprising subtypes 1 (56 patients), 2 (9 patients), 3 (23 patients), and not specified (99 patients). Auditory outcomes included improved sound detection, speech perception, and speech intelligibility. QOL outcomes were reported for 75 patients, with benefit reported in the majority.

CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with Usher syndrome develop improved auditory outcomes after cochlear implantation with early implantation being an important factor.

PMID:37930386 | DOI:10.1007/s00405-023-08304-2

Categories: 2022

A Multicenter Comparison of 1-yr Functional Outcomes and Programming Differences Between the Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala and SlimJ Electrode Arrays

Fri, 27/10/2023 - 11:00

Otol Neurotol. 2023 Oct 27. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004048. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a difference in hearing outcomes or stimulation levels between Advanced Bionics straight and precurved arrays.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review across three implant centers.

SETTING: Tertiary centers for cochlear and auditory brainstem implantation.

PATIENTS: One hundred fifteen pediatric and 205 adult cochlear implants (CIs) were reviewed. All patients were implanted under the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2009 guidelines with a HiRes Ultra SlimJ or Mid-Scala electrode array.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hearing preservation after implantation, as well as CI-only listening scores for Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences were compared 1 year after implantation. Stimulation levels for threshold and comfort levels were also compared 1 year after implantation.

RESULTS: Hearing preservation was significantly better with the SlimJ compared with the Mid-Scala electrode array. Bamford-Kowal-Bench outcomes were not significantly different between the two arrays in any listening condition. Stimulation levels were not different between arrays but did vary across electrode contacts. At least one electrode was deactivated in 33% of implants but was more common for the SlimJ device.

CONCLUSION: Modern straight and precurved arrays from Advanced Bionics did not differ in hearing performance or current requirements. Although hearing preservation was possible with both devices, the SlimJ array would still be the preferred electrode in cases where hearing preservation was a priority. Unfortunately, the SlimJ device was also prone to poor sound perception on basal electrodes. Further investigation is needed to determine if deactivated electrodes are associated with electrode position/migration, and if programming changes are needed to optimize the use of these high-frequency channels.

PMID:37889939 | DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004048

Categories: 2022

The effect of photobiomodulation on hearing loss: A systematic review

Fri, 27/10/2023 - 11:00

Clin Otolaryngol. 2023 Oct 26. doi: 10.1111/coa.14113. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess outcomes associated with photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) for hearing loss in human and animal studies.

DESIGN: Systematic review and narrative synthesis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

SETTING: Data bases searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science. No limits were placed on language or year of publication. Review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement.

PARTICIPANTS: All human and animal subjects treated with PBMT for hearing loss.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pre- and post-PBMT audio metric outcomes.

RESULTS: Searches identified 122 abstracts and 49 full text articles. Of these, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 327 animals (11 studies), 30 humans (1 study), and 40 animal specimens (5 studies). PBMT parameters included 6 different wavelengths: 908 nm (1 study), 810 nm (1 study), 532 & 635 nm (1 study), 830 nm (3 studies), 808 nm (11 studies). The duration ranged from 4 to 60 minutes in a session, and the follow-up ranged from 5-28 days. Outcomes improved significantly when wavelengths within the range of 800-830 nm were used, and with greater duration of PBMT exposure. Included studies predominantly consisted of non-randomized controlled trials (10 studies).

CONCLUSIONS: Hearing outcomes following PBMT appear to be superior to no PBMT for subjects with hearing loss, although higher level evidence is required to verify this. PBMT enables concentrated, focused delivery of light therapy to the inner ear through a non-invasive manner with minimal side effects. As a result of heterogeneity in reporting PBMT parameters and outcomes across the included studies, direct comparison is challenging.

PMID:37885344 | DOI:10.1111/coa.14113

Categories: 2022

Outcomes of Cochlear implantation in early-deafened patients with Waardenburg syndrome: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

Fri, 25/08/2023 - 11:00

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023 Jul 11;8(4):1094-1107. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1110. eCollection 2023 Aug.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to establish the expected hearing and speech outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with profound congenital deafness secondary to Waardenburg syndrome (WS).

METHODS: A systematic review of the literature and narrative synthesis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Databases searched: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits were placed on language or year of publication.

RESULTS: Searches identified 186 abstracts and full texts. Of these, 16 studies met inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 179 patients and at least 194 implants. Hearing outcomes of those receiving cochlear implantation were generally good. Five studies included genetic analysis of one or more of the participants. A total of 11 peri/post-operative complications were reported. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, mainly comprising noncontrolled case series with small cohort size. All studies were OCEBM grade III-IV.

CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation in congenitally deafened children with Waardenburg Syndrome is a well-established intervention as a method of auditory rehabilitation. Due to the uncommon nature of the condition, there is a lack of large-scale high-quality studies examining the use of cochlear implantation in this patient group. However, overall outcomes following implantation are positive with the majority of patients demonstrating improved audiometry, speech perception and speech intelligibility supporting its use in appropriately selected cases.

PMID:37621295 | PMC:PMC10446317 | DOI:10.1002/lio2.1110

Categories: 2022

Incomplete Partition Type II Cochlear Malformations: Delineating the Three-Dimensional Structure from Digitized Human Histopathological Specimens

Fri, 25/08/2023 - 11:00

Otol Neurotol. 2023 Aug 23. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003999. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: There are clinically relevant differences in scalae anatomy and spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) quantity between incomplete partition type II (IP-II) and normal cochleae.

BACKGROUND: IP-II is a commonly implanted cochlear malformation. Detailed knowledge of intracochlear three-dimensional (3D) morphology may assist with cochlear implant (CI) electrode selection/design and enable optimization of audiologic programming based on SGN maps.

METHODS: IP-II (n = 11) human temporal bone histological specimens were identified from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders National Temporal Bone Registry and digitized. The cochlear duct, scalae, and surgically relevant anatomy were reconstructed in 3D. A machine learning algorithm was applied to map the location and number of SGNs.

RESULTS: 3D scalae morphology of the basal turn was normal. Scala tympani (ST) remained isolated for 540 degrees before fusing with scala vestibuli. Mean ST volume reduced below 1 mm2 after the first 340 degrees. Scala media was a distinct endolymphatic compartment throughout; mean ± standard deviation cochlear duct length was 28 ± 3 mm. SGNs were reduced compared with age-matched norms (mean, 48%; range, 5-90%). In some cases, SGNs failed to ascend Rosenthal's canal, remaining in an abnormal basalward modiolar location. Two forms of IP-II were seen: type A and type B. A majority (98-100%) of SGNs were located in the basal modiolus in type B IP-II, compared with 76 to 85% in type A.

CONCLUSION: Hallmark features of IP-II cochleae include the following: 1) fusion of the ST and scala vestibuli at a mean of 540 degrees, 2) highly variable and overall reduced SGN quantity compared with normative controls, and 3) abnormal SGN distribution with cell bodies failing to ascend Rosenthal's canal.

PMID:37621122 | DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003999

Categories: 2022

Electrophysiological In Vitro Study of Long-Range Signal Transmission by Astrocytic Networks

Mon, 24/07/2023 - 11:00

Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023 Jul 23:e2301756. doi: 10.1002/advs.202301756. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Astrocytes are diverse brain cells that form large networks communicating via gap junctions and chemical transmitters. Despite recent advances, the functions of astrocytic networks in information processing in the brain are not fully understood. In culture, brain slices, and in vivo, astrocytes, and neurons grow in tight association, making it challenging to establish whether signals that spread within astrocytic networks communicate with neuronal groups at distant sites, or whether astrocytes solely respond to their local environments. A multi-electrode array (MEA)-based device called AstroMEA is designed to separate neuronal and astrocytic networks, thus allowing to study the transfer of chemical and/or electrical signals transmitted via astrocytic networks capable of changing neuronal electrical behavior. AstroMEA demonstrates that cortical astrocytic networks can induce a significant upregulation in the firing frequency of neurons in response to a theta-burst charge-balanced biphasic current stimulation (5 pulses of 100 Hz × 10 with 200 ms intervals, 2 s total duration) of a separate neuronal-astrocytic group in the absence of direct neuronal contact. This result corroborates the view of astrocytic networks as a parallel mechanism of signal transmission in the brain that is separate from the neuronal connectome. Translationally, it highlights the importance of astrocytic network protection as a treatment target.

PMID:37485646 | DOI:10.1002/advs.202301756

Categories: 2022

Meningitis Risk in Patients with Inner Ear Malformations after Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Thu, 15/06/2023 - 11:00

Otol Neurotol. 2023 Jun 15. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003913. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the rate of postoperative meningitis after cochlear implantation in those with inner ear malformations (IEMs) via meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library.

METHODS: This study was reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Proportion meta-analysis was conducted through an inverse variance random-effect model based on arcsin transformation and presented as forest plots. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed through the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool.

RESULTS: Overall, 38 of 2966 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. There were 10 cases of meningitis after cochlear implantation in 1300 malformed ears. The overall rate of meningitis after cochlear implantation in IEMs was 0.12% (95% confidence interval, 0.006-0.380%; I2 = 0%). Cases occurred in incomplete partition (n = 5), Mondini deformity (n = 2), common cavity (n = 2), and enlarged internal auditory canal (n = 1). Six of 10 cases of postoperative meningitis occurred with an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak.

CONCLUSION: In those with IEMs, the risk of meningitis after cochlear implantation is very low.

PMID:37317518 | DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003913

Categories: 2022

Tissue-Engineered Cochlear Fibrosis Model Links Complex Impedance to Fibrosis Formation for Cochlear Implant Patients

Tue, 13/06/2023 - 11:00

Adv Healthc Mater. 2023 Jun 13:e2300732. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202300732. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implants are a life-changing technology for those with severe sensorineural hearing loss, partially restoring hearing through direct electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. However, they are known to elicit an immune response resulting in fibrotic tissue formation in the cochlea which is linked to residual hearing loss and suboptimal outcomes. Intracochlear fibrosis is difficult to track without post-mortem histology, and no specific electrical marker for fibrosis exists. In this study, we developed a tissue-engineered model of cochlear fibrosis following implant placement to examine the electrical characteristics associated with fibrotic tissue formation around electrodes. We characterized the model using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and found an increase in the resistance and a decrease in capacitance of the tissue using a representative circuit. This result informed a new marker of fibrosis progression over time that is extractable from voltage waveform responses, which can be directly measured in cochlear implant patients. This marker was tested in a small sample size of recently implanted cochlear implant patients, showing a significant increase over two post-operative timepoints. Using this system, we demonstrated complex impedance as a marker of fibrosis progression that is directly measurable from cochlear implants to enable real-time tracking of fibrosis formation in patients, creating opportunities for earlier treatment intervention to improve cochlear implant efficacy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

PMID:37310792 | DOI:10.1002/adhm.202300732

Categories: 2022

Models of Cochlea Used in Cochlear Implant Research: A Review

Sat, 22/04/2023 - 11:00

Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Apr 22. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03192-3. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

As the first clinically translated machine-neural interface, cochlear implants (CI) have demonstrated much success in providing hearing to those with severe to profound hearing loss. Despite their clinical effectiveness, key drawbacks such as hearing damage, partly from insertion forces that arise during implantation, and current spread, which limits focussing ability, prevent wider CI eligibility. In this review, we provide an overview of the anatomical and physical properties of the cochlea as a resource to aid the development of accurate models to improve future CI treatments. We highlight the advancements in the development of various physical, animal, tissue engineering, and computational models of the cochlea and the need for such models, challenges in their use, and a perspective on their future directions.

PMID:37087541 | DOI:10.1007/s10439-023-03192-3

Categories: 2022

Frequency of electrode migration after cochlear implantation in the early postoperative period. What are associated risk factors?

Thu, 13/04/2023 - 11:00

Clin Otolaryngol. 2023 Apr 13. doi: 10.1111/coa.14062. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of, and risk factors associated with electrode migration (EM) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients.

DESIGN: Historical cohort study of all CIs performed between 1 January 2018 and 1 August 2021 in a single tertiary adult and paediatric CI centre in the UK.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary aim is to determine the prevalence of electrode migration, comparing intraoperative surgeon report and examination of a routine plain radiograph performed 2 weeks after surgery. EM is defined as the detection of movement of two or more electrodes out of the cochlea from the time of surgery. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate preoperative and intraoperative risk factors that might predispose to migration.

RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-five patients, having 516 distinct surgeries, with 628 implants were analysed. EM occurred following 11.5% of implant operations. Pre-existing cochlear abnormality was an independent associated risk factor for EM (OR: 3.40 ⟨1.20-9.62⟩ p = .021). Demographics, surgical technique, usage of a precurved electrode, CSF leak, surgeon seniority and intraoperative telemetry did not influence risk of migration. There were 5 implants (0.8%) which migrated later than 2 weeks, with a median date of imaging diagnosis (x-ray or CT scan) of 263 days ⟨IQR:198⟩, for which head injury was a common precipitating factor. There were differences in the risk of migration between different lateral wall electrodes.

CONCLUSION: EM in the early postoperative period is a common occurrence and is more likely in implant recipients with obstructed or malformed cochleae.

PMID:37051731 | DOI:10.1111/coa.14062

Categories: 2022

Aetiology and management options for secondary referred otalgia: a systematic review and meta-analyses

Mon, 03/04/2023 - 11:00

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Apr 3. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07928-8. Online ahead of print.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:37010599 | DOI:10.1007/s00405-023-07928-8

Categories: 2022

The Risk of Meningitis After Cochlear Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fri, 03/03/2023 - 11:00

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Mar 2. doi: 10.1002/ohn.309. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to estimate the rate of postoperative meningitis (both immediate and long-term) in patients following cochlear implants (CIs). It aims to do so through a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies tracking complications after CIs.

DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library.

REVIEW METHODS: This review was performed in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies tracking complications following CIs in patients were included. Exclusion criteria included non-English language studies and case series reporting <10 patients. Bias risk was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed through DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models.

RESULTS: A total of 116/1931 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, there were 112 cases of meningitis in 58,940 patients after CIs. Meta-analysis estimated an overall rate of postoperative meningitis of 0.07% (95% confidence interval [CIs], 0.03%-0.1%; I2 = 55%). Subgroup meta-analysis showed this rate had 95% CIs crossing 0% in implanted patients who received the pneumococcal vaccine, antibiotic prophylaxis, those with postoperative acute otitis media (AOM), and those implanted less than 5 years.

CONCLUSION: Meningitis is a rare complication following CIs. Our estimated rates of meningitis after CIs appear lower than prior estimates based on epidemiological studies in the early 2000s. However, the rate still appears higher than the baseline rate in the general population. The risk was very low in implanted patients who received the pneumococcal vaccine, antibiotic prophylaxis, received unilateral or bilateral implantations, developed AOM, those implanted with a round window or cochleostomy techniques, and those under 5 years.

PMID:36864717 | DOI:10.1002/ohn.309

Categories: 2022

UK consensus definitions for necrotising otitis externa: a Delphi study

Wed, 22/02/2023 - 11:00

BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 20;13(2):e061349. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061349.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To establish consensus definitions for necrotising otitis externa (NOE) to facilitate the diagnosis and exclusion of NOE in clinical practice and expedite future high-quality study of this neglected condition.

DESIGN: The work comprised of a systematic review of the literature, five iterative rounds of consultation via a Delphi process and open discussion within the collaborative. An expert panel analysed the results to produce the final outputs which were shared with and endorsed by national specialty bodies.

SETTING: Secondary care in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS: UK clinical specialists practising in infection, ear nose and throat (ENT) surgery or radiology.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Definitions and statements meeting the following criteria were accepted: (a) minimum of 70% of respondents in agreement or strong agreement with a definition/statement AND (b) <15% of respondents in disagreement or strong disagreement with a definition/statement.

RESULTS: Seventy-four UK clinicians specialising in ENT, Infection and Radiology with a special interest in NOE took part in the work which was undertaken between 2019 and 2021. The minimum response rate for a Round was 76%. Consensus criteria for all proposed case definitions, outcome definitions and consensus statements were met in the fifth round.

CONCLUSIONS: This work distills the clinical opinion of a large group of multidisciplinary specialists from across the UK to create practical definitions and statements to support clinical practice and research for NOE. This is the first step in an iterative process. Further work will seek to validate and test these definitions and inform their evolution.

PMID:36806133 | PMC:PMC9945308 | DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061349

Categories: 2022

Exploring patient experiences and concerns in the online Cochlear Implant community: a cross-sectional study and validation of automated topic modelling

Mon, 16/01/2023 - 11:00

Clin Otolaryngol. 2023 Jan 16. doi: 10.1111/coa.14037. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of research examining patient experiences of cochlear implants. We sought to use natural language processing methods to explore patient experiences and concerns in the online cochlear implant (CI) community.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study of posts on the online Reddit r/CochlearImplants forum from 1 March 2015 to 11 November 2021. Natural language processing using the BERTopic automated topic modelling technique was employed to cluster posts into semantically similar topics. Topic categorisation was manually validated by two independent reviewers and Cohen's kappa calculated to determine inter-rater reliability between machine vs human and human vs human categorisation.

RESULTS: We retrieved 987 posts from 588 unique Reddit users on the r/CochlearImplants forum. Posts were initially categorised by BERTopic into 16 different Topics, which were increased to 23 Topics following manual inspection. The most popular topics related to CI connectivity (n = 112), adults considering getting a CI (n=107), surgery-related posts (n = 89) and day-to-day living with a CI (n = 85). Cohen's kappa among all posts was 0.62 (machine vs human) and 0.72 (human vs human), and among categorised posts was 0.85 (machine vs human) and 0.84 (human vs human).

CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional study of social media discussions amongst the online cochlear implant community identified common attitudes, experiences and concerns of patients living with, or seeking, a cochlear implant. Our validation of natural language processing methods to categorise topics shows that automated analysis of similar Otolaryngology-related content is a viable and accurate alternative to manual qualitative approaches. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

PMID:36645237 | DOI:10.1111/coa.14037

Categories: 2022